This is more a rant than anything else, and a bit removed from the dialogue of hiking, and hiking clothes for women. Yes I'd love to start a clothing company of my own which might even have it’s own “social mission” so to speak. Clothes companies targets are making money by targeting women. In the method nearly all of clothes firms make the world worse for women. It is as whether it is an agenda towards ladies. Most likely most women’s types are designed and conceptualized by males from the drawing board to the final sewing collectively of the apparel item. The few ladies who are within the women’s clothes design trade apparently are doing little or nothing to instigate a trend toward better clothes designs for women who want practicality, dignity and function in their clothes. And that's the place the dilemma comes in for plenty of girls who don’t care about “Looking younger” or “Being girly.” Women who just need purposeful, snug clothes are truly underrepresented . Certain, lots of people would say “Not so. Since a variety of low-rise or skin-tight denims, and cleavage-revealing shirts and crotch-length shorts, and tastelessly-short skirts are the form of clothes that probably the majority of ladies buy (judging by the prominence and availability of such clothing) , then it means those are the kinds that may continue to be manufactured and furthermore these sorts of “feminine styles” will make their manner into all sorts of women’s clothes, even the ones which can be supposed to be for perform not style. ” So their women’s shirts are designed with “princess seams” and curve-enhancing stitches etc. It is not the only clothes firm that makes “active-women’s wear” that incorporates fashion into function. It brings us back to where we started. As quite a few ladies who posted here on “Hiking Lady” have said, they resort to men’s clothes for higher fit, better consolation, higher freedom of motion and higher durability. I'd say that normally unisex sizing is the perfect method to go along with some features that may help accommodate people who might have a bit more hip or stomach (both women and men). Nearly all of women’s “active wear” simply don’t have it. ’s clothes. Men’s sizes are larger even on the subject of “small” sizes for males. I doubt that is inconceivable. Basically, ladies can fit into men’s clothing this fashion. The scrubs had been provided by the facility. I just lately was working in a research facility and was required to wear scrubs. I instructed her that with regards to scrubs, a size small pant doesn't match me and it's strange because most small-measurement men’s pants match me. The availability person said she thought a size small would fit me. The provision individual stated that it's because women have hips and men don’t. I advised her that evidently quite a lot of small-sized males would find it exhausting to fit in most small-sized scrubs too. What lots of people seem to overlook is that some males do have fairly-outstanding hips and the vast majority of men’s clothes are meant for men with completely straight hips. Actually when men get older, in their 40s they very often develop bigger hips. Years in the past, I recall a radio industrial for a particular form of Levis denims which had been meant for older men and it was stated that the features had extra room in the hip and thigh. Yet men have a better deal when it comes to clothes. Women’s clothes is at all times made to incorporate trend quite than perform. EMS and REI and Sierra Trading Submit, and Moosejaw, and Cabela’s and Sportsman’s Guide, and varied different such stores, or on-line shops have a few of the better sorts of clothes meant for hiking and other outside actions. Brands equivalent to Ex-Officio, Arctryx, The North Face, Sherpa, Marmot, Mammut, Mountain Hardwear, Columbia and numerous others. These brands are inclined to have the best possible materials, and the best options. They have one of the best mix of fabrics so as to be lightweight as attainable for scorching days and which can protect in chilly days with out a lot of bulk. They tend to have SPF inbuilt to guard the wearer from the sun’s rays. I had to make use of a large measurement to have room for my shoulders and arms however then the part of the jacket that was beneath the waist bellowed out and just was uncomfortable to put on and just had a very awkward look to it. But, I have seen such absurdly-lower jackets for women by The North Face. It was “merely” meant to reinforce the feminine type whereas being “useful” for outdoor exercise, or that's what the designers had in mind and yet I have to surprise what they were thinking by making a jacket like this. It felt tight and restricting once i moved. I don’t know how it ever acquired manufactured and possibly 1000's have been made and it gave the impression to be a waste of time and materials and it seemed as if the “quality control people” missed some major design flaws. I want I wrote down the model quantity in order that perhaps I might discover a hyperlink to it in the internet and maybe you all can see for your self. There are other women’s lively wear that will not be as extreme however which nonetheless have sufficient lack of perform so that most active girls simply can't use them. The Hole and Previous Navy should not notably for active wear however they've small line of such clothes. I think that they're terrible in material and design. The Gap, Old Navy, Modell’s, Target, Okay-Mart and different such shops, basically solely have clothes product of cotton ( with a couple of exceptions). Modell’s is speculated to be a “sports store” however it carries train clothing for women which is made by Nike, Addidas (etc) and though these are nicely-known model names, I find that they actually put an excessive amount of style into clothes at the expense of perform. They went out of enterprise years in the past but they also had clothing for girls that I discovered to be impractically designed. In New York Metropolis the place I reside there is one REI and two EMSs and one not-as-effectively-recognized store in decrease Manhattan which sells all sorts of out of doors/camping/hiking tools and clothes. There was a store in NYC known as Herman’s and another called Robbin’s. Removed from it. I have seen girls in these shops talking to sales associates and saying that they've looked in all places for more sensible designs . There is an organization that a variety of you most likely have heard of called “Title 9.” They strictly make women’s lively put on. There are numerous Modell’s and one Sports activities Authority, and a few Old Navy’s and It would seem that there are loads of shops that would have something for each woman. Guess what? It doesn’t work. Nearly all of their types are meant to “enhance figures” and make the wearer “look feminine” while enjoying sports or partaking in rugged outside actions. Why do I always notice that the clothes that come the closest to being functional and rugged and sensible are the ones which can be discontinued and changed by those who aren’t? Their women’s bathing fits are really useless. They are meant for ladies who've excellent figures , even who're skilled fashions and the bathing suits are sexist in my opinion. They may continue a certain style for several seasons or they may replace the fashion and never revive it. Why ought to any bathing go well with be “hi-cut” or like a thong and the highest be meant to reveal cleavage? Title 9 has had certain kinds of designs referred to as “Grab and Go” meaning that the clothes are so practically designed which you could just seize them, throw them on, and stroll out the door to train or do anything else. Are you going to go swimming or browsing , or are you going to work in a “gentleman’s club” ? I wish that it was as advertised to be. Throughout my life I've gone from store to store during certain instances of the 12 months searching for the very best rugged and practical clothes for winter or summer. It is always exhausting to search out something near what I want. It typically goes for shoes and slippers and different footwear too. I often have to take no matter comes closest and that is often within the men’s section. There are designs which I'll go to my grave scratching my head over relating to why they were made the way in which they have been.. I as soon as found some snug slip-ons made by Teva. But the absurd thing was that the soles were designed with fairly-deep grooves that had been very closely spaced they usually have been all over the only . Just why aren’t sneakers and footwear made to be cleaned? They are the main piece of clothes that might be touching the bottom and going by means of all kinds of disgusting stuff. I've had a fantasy of designing footwear that are meant to be cleaned and are straightforward to scrub. I can’t for the life of me perceive why such a design was made. To allow climbing on rocky or uneven surfaces, and yet it does not work on any type of foot wear like it works on a Jeep’s tires. I know that hiking boot soles are made like a Jeep’s tires are made. Why hasn’t any clothing manufacturer observed this? With footwear, small rocks and mud and leaves and branches (and so forth) get stuck within the grooves of hiking boot soles. With a Jeep’s wheels, the constant and intense rolling of the tires signifies that a whole lot of the debris might be hurled off. No human can create that form of physical pressure to continually power the mud and pebbles and debris to be hurled out of the shoe’s soles. The way that the grooves are designed it solely makes the soles exhausting to clean. It implies that the grooves on the soles of hiking boots might be stuffed up with debris and wouldn't assist much in helping the wearer to effectively climb; that is if the grooves on the soles of hiking boots are actually meant to enable the wearer to climb. It appears to me that if the soles are made from rubber there isn’t a necessity for such elaborately designed grooves that solely gather dirt. I wonder why there aren’t chemists and clothes technicians working on a better kind of rubber that grips on all surfaces or grips better on rocky surfaces or wherever hiking sneakers are used, and it could make it unnecessary to make grooves on the soles of sneakers. I have observed some unusual designs that do not contribute to function. It seems to me that grooves are simply put on the soles of shoes for vogue functions. This goes for sneakers too. A whole lot of sneakers which would be good in design in different ways, have very impractically designed soles. As far as sweatpants , scrub pants , and different such kinds of pants, there are these which have “elastic waist” or “comfort waist” and there are those with drawstrings. After all I'm not an knowledgeable in making sneakers or shoe-soles and that i could possibly be flawed , but I am sufficient of an knowledgeable in sporting footwear meant for lively lifestyles and I feel that quite a lot of shoe manufacturers are focusing on the flawed thing. I'm wondering why any pant is designed with a drawstring when an elastic waist would make it pointless . Now-a-days a majority of drawstring-waist are made so that the drawstring is stitched into the back of the pants waist space. I hate something with a drawstring waist. I believe it makes the drawstring less effective and it defeats the purpose of the drawstring. Underwear: I have been in shops such as K-Mart and Target the place there are a big number of women’s underwear. It is difficult to find the type of briefs that the majority of our grandmothers used to wear, not “hi-cuts,” not ” boy shorts,” not thongs. All are horrible in my opinion. I choose consolation, durability and straightforward-care. All that does not converse for me. Anything that will get stuck you-know-the place is unacceptable. I've been within the underwear section of shops and different stores (I have to admit I never appeared in Victoria’s Secret however I don’t expect to search out anything sensible there), and I've seen older women trying to find something that's age-appropriate and dignified and , again, practical. There is little other than these hi-cuts. See one of many hyperlinks under for an article about the history of women’s underwear. Even “briefs” aren't modest enough. It seems it has all the time been about physically limiting girls. That’s the way I have a look at it. Additionally one of many links beneath lead to an article about how there will probably be a women’s like of clothes which might be impressed by “Barbie.” Isn’t this 2014? It means that the elastic is sewn into the “hem” of the legs and waist. The closest I have discovered to what I prefer is a sure Jockey brand temporary “Elance.” It has “banded” legs and waist which is the better form of design to get. Elastic that is merely sewn ONTO the waist and legs tends to be much less rugged and the stitching can come undone more easily . I need to order a dimension larger than I usually would in order that the waist wouldn't be too tight. One major flaw with “Elance” is that the waist is designed to be tight. And, I don’t perceive the real objective of “athletic bras” the way in which they're designed. I sure don’t care about “standing out.” ( I actually don’t in any case, and that i don’t care). Bras meant for lively lifestyles should hold them in, nothing more. I have heard of bras meant to “lift and separate.” I've seen some feminine runners who look like prime heavy and still they're very fast but I ponder if they are going to develop back problems later in life. I know that I may not be addressing the needs of women born with sure sizes, or who have special wants similar to after surgery, however sport bras ought to be made to have enough snug tension to forestall bouncing. There may be a necessity for bras that do what some jock straps are presupposed to do. I want to design shirts and vests with tension built into the proper space that may make bras unnecessary. It would be great for hotter weather and for simplicity, so you don’t have to hassle with attaching a bra after which a shirt. Simply keep “them” from moving. Just slip into your shirt (and different clothes ) and you may exit to walk , jog or whatever. Why isn’t there such a factor? I feel I mentioned in one of my earlier posts that Coolibar had a fairly good pant for ladies known as Solar Pant. I'm positive numerous ladies would need such sorts of clothes. I then installed an elastic band to supply extra tension for the reason that waist band could be a bit too giant otherwise, and the pant is virtually a dream. I did have to alter the waist myself by taking out the drawstring which concerned cutting into the again of the waistband space since the drawstring was sewn into that space. It is rather practical for a whole lot of activities. It isn't so lengthy that the hem drags on the ground. It's not for very very hot weather but that can depend by yourself means to tolerate sizzling weather. It's of a fabric mix that's not like cotton. All pants should have pockets, however sometimes the best way the pockets are designed make them useless anyway. I discover it is a really particular person thing. This is how most hiking pants should be designed. It's a teensy bit too dense for extremely popular weather very very similar to the original Coolibar Sun Pant. It is supposed for use with a belt but I find that I don’t want one to put on this pant. I discovered a pant on Cabela’s that is for men, but which suits properly and it's named “The utility Pant” (see one of the last two hyperlinks under). It stretches a bit so it does not get tight while you bend or transfer. Of course not everyone has the same figure as I achieve this others might have a unique opinion. However basically this is an effective sort of pant . Should you do prefer it you must write to the company and tell them to dangle on these pants. One flaw with this pant is that the entrance pockets are designed so as the openings are slits almost completely parallel with the waist. I feel they're going to discontinue it so that you might want to present it a try. The material stretches so it is not as bad as if it were with jeans with these sorts of pockets. It is an impractical design and i don’t know why clothes designers make pant pockets like this. With these sorts of pockets you need to maneuver your hands in a extra unnatural way and even raise the hem of your shirt to put your palms in your front pants pockets. It has to be for fashion, nothing else. Pockets ought to be a line down the thigh, or a diagonal line is sweet too. It's bra shorts a good idea to have zippered pockets. Anybody who has ever gotten his/her open pocket caught on a door knob or the handlebar of a bike whereas passing by too shut will know what I mean. But generally zippers could cause scrapes to the back of the hand when you set your palms in. There's a must design zippers of non-scraping material for this function. There can be another men’s pant from Columbia. I believe I mentioned them earlier than (see one in all the 2 hyperlinks under). Why aren’t any clothing designers engaged on this? They're of a great materials for hot days, but for me, I found myself removing the belt and sewing an elastic band within the back of the waistband space so as to make the belt pointless. I trip a bike. I hardly ever use shorts even when i jog. But again, I should settle for whatever comes near what I need. I got here throughout a running short called Brooks Sherpa IV. I have a tendency to just go to clothes stores to take a look at designs and supplies . What I did like about it was the lightweight material. I simply wondered why regular lengthy pants will not be manufactured from such a fabric. It could be excellent for a hiking pant meant for extremely popular weather. The fabric was very very like a very very lightweight softshell. There's one from the North Face referred to as The Prolix jacket. I like softshell clothing. It is rather lightweight, not superb for cold weather by itself but you may put layering below it. It is versatile and matches excellently and permits freedom of motion. But softshells are made for winter, spring and fall, not summer. Also , why aren’t there any actually actually practically-designed vests? The Brook’s Sherpa IV would make an ideal summertime softshell. There needs to be a vest for traveling. I find myself wishing for such a thing. It does not exist. Why not make one of lightweight and stretchy materials? I know that I have said to much on this post. I'll cease for now. I hope I did not bore anyone. I've a lot of concepts for the higher design of clothing and I'll most likely publish again with my ideas unless I am informed to not. I might have been a bit political too.
